TV Tech replied: "My journey with DSLRs began back in 2003 with the original Digital Rebel. DSLRs changed my photography for the better like nothing else. Five years and some 25,000 shots later, it's still going strong. Along the way I upgraded to the Canon 30D, which is a fantastic camera as well. When the 40D was announced, I decided to wait until the 50D sometime in 2009, but wanted a newer backup/second body for my photography needs. So when the XSi/450D was announced, it sounded like a perfect fit for my needs.
I got it from Amazon.com three days ago, and have given it a pretty good workout since then, having shot about 650 shots under a variety of shooting conditions and with a number of different Canon and third-party lenses. The following are my impressions.
The build feels very good. The camera feels wonderfully light yet well built. I'm 6ft tall with average size hands, and the camera feels good in my hand. The battery grip, to me, defeats the purpose of having a small, light DSLR, so I opted for a Hakuba/Opteka grip (it's a plate that screws into the tripod socket that enables you to use the excellent Canon E1 hand strap with it) and I couldn't be happier. I'm not a fan of neck straps, so this works well for me (see the uploaded photo for the configuration).
Most of the menu buttons on the back feel different from the ones on the original Digital Rebel and the 30D; the XSi buttons feel more tactile and have a definite "click" to them when you press them. The exception are the Exposure Lock (*) and AF selector buttons, which have retained the deeper, softer feel of the older cameras. Just different, not better or worse, for me.
The LCD is now 3" with 230K pixels. The playback images look awesome, and probably because of the higher resolution of the sensor, there's a very slight delay when you zoom in to 10x while the image loads and displays properly. People coming from other cameras or brands might not even notice it--I only did so because of the difference between it and my two other Canon DSLRs (which have lower resolution sensors). The viewing angle of the LCD screen (how clearly you can see the screen from side and up and down) is excellent; you can still see the screen holding the camera almost straight up for an overhead shot (more on this later). I'd estimate the viewing angle is about 160-170 degrees both horizontally and vertically.
The Digital Rebel has a separate status screen above the main LCD screen, and the 30D had one on top of the camera, so I wasn't sure if I was going to like the big LCD acting as the status screen and no top screen. I'm happy to say that this arrangement works well. The back screen makes it really easy to take all the settings at a glance. The viewfinder is much larger and brighter than that in the Digital Rebel. A welcome feature for me is the always displayed ISO value in the viewfinder.
The camera is only half of the image quality equation, the other being the lenses being used. Coupled with my favorite lens, the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L telephoto lens, the XSi turns out fantastic images. The supplied kit lens is very light and compact for being an image stabilized lens, and turns out good performance. The IS is certainly very useful.
Two features that used to be missing from the Digital Rebels and found in the more expensive DSLRs are now featured in the XSi: spot-metering and flash exposure compensation (these may have been available in the previous Digital Rebel model, the XTi, as well). The inclusion of those two features make the camera a much more complete and compelling photographic tool. The timer function now has a custom mode, where it'll count down from 10 seconds then take a number of shots (specified by you) in succession. No more running back and forth to reset the timer after each shot! There's also the traditional 2-second timer.
Let's talk for a minute about sensor and the ISO values. XSi/450D has five ISO values you can choose: 100 (best image quality), 200, 400, 800, and 1600. Higher ISO increases the camera sensor's sensitivity to light, thus you can achieve faster shutter speeeds for a given lighting condition. However, the trade-off is that the sensor "noise" (think grain for film photography) increases with higher ISO, so you get a degraded image quality in return for less blurred photos from hand shakes (thanks to faster shutter speed). This may come in handy in situations where flash photography is not permitted, such as a museum or a concert or theater. HOWEVER, compared to point-and-shoot digital cameras, the larger sensors of DSLRs, including the XSi, means that even at ISO 800 and 1600 you get very usable images right out of the camera. Running th"
Elvis replied: "my suggestion
go to the links below for help
"
Digital cameras: Shutter lag time. how do brands compare? What other factors effect shutter lag time? 5 different places gave me 5 different answers and recommended 5 different brands as the "fastest". I'm hoping to spend $150 or less.
TomTom replied: "my suggestion
go to yahoo shopping
digital cameras
digital camera GUIDE
be sure to check titles on the left side
the guide should answer your questions"
Dr. Sam replied: "If you pre-focus by pressing the shutter button half-way down while aiming at your subject - or where you anticipate your subject will be when you want to take the picture - it will help considerably. You can set your camera in "Sport" mode or "Scenery" and this will minimize the lag. If you do not use the flash, it will help. If you turn off "face detection," it will help. If you turn off the LCD monitor and use the viewfinder only, it will help.
Some point and shoot cameras are better than others. I have a Canon Powershot SD900 that seems quite fast to me. If you go to and read the reviews (once they are available for the cameras you are considering), you can go to the page called "Performance" and see exactly what the tested shutter lag is, as well as several other performace benchmarks.
Here's a link showing a chart of various cameras and their shutter lag as well as the time it takes to shoot five frames. You will not see any DSLR's listed, because they have no shutter lag. If you click on the column heading, such as "One Shot," the chart will sort according to that measurement."
Grey Rabbit replied: "If you are looking under $150. Then there will not be any big difference between brands. The best method to deal with shutter lag is turn off as many automatic features as possible. Also, the flash will add additional lag since it takes time for it to charge.
Pretty open on cameras. There are Samsung, Nikon, & Canon cameras that are all in that range and are all going to have about the same lag.
The reason that you had 5 different answers are personal preferences from the people that you talked to.
There is a great deal of bias towards manufactures in the camera world.
At the moment, one major camera retailer has sales competition with the following manufactures.
Sony, Canon, JVC, Olympus, Samsung, FujiFilm, & Nikon...
Depending on who you talk to they might be competing in such a competition."
What is the easiest point and shoot digital camera that does not have shutter lag or give red eyes? Please be product specific. Thanks.
Derrick E replied: "i like the Powershot. i think its from Sony but im not 100% sure"
Shutterbug replied: "Ok, first of all there is no camera that will not give you red eye once in a while. Red eye comes from the flash reflecting off the retina of the eye. This happens when the flash is very close to the lens as is the case in P&S cameras and when the subject is looking directly into the camera.
The problem is cured in several ways. One way obviously is to not use flash but that's not always possible. The next way is to ask your subject to look away from the camera, they don't need to turn their head only their eyes. A third solution is what you find on the P&S cameras, use the red eye feature on the flash. What it does is send out a few short flashes that usually close down the iris of the eye and then send out a brighter flash. Most of the time this works but not always. A fourth solution is to use an auxiliary flash, basically a flash that attaches to the top of the camera or can be held away from the camera. In this case the subject doesn't get the light directly into the retina.
Now shutter lag is a different story. If you go for an SLR there is no shutter lag and yet there can be a delay. There are three things that cause shutter lag - flash, focus and exposure. Measuring the exposure is the simplest for the camera and usually happens in a tiny fraction of a second. Getting the focus right is trickier, that can take a half second to a second if the subject is easy to focus on, it can take longer if the subject is in poor lighting. On top of that the motor that drives the auto focus mechanism is usually slow and relatively weak to conserve battery power, but that of course delays getting the lens focussed. Flash is the third, it takes time to charge up the flash when it fires and P&S cameras tend to charge the flash when you press the shutter instead of ahead of time. That's deliberate because this saves power and prevents your batteries from draining even faster.
Dealing with shutter lag is not so easy. Forget exposure, that always happens quickly. Flash can be addressed by keeping your finger on the shutter, holding it down half way until you're ready to shoot. This drains your battery but ensures that the flash is always ready to go. When you're ready shoot you lift your finger briefly and then press the shutter and it should be almost instant ... well ... except for focus.
Dealing with focus is not always easy. If you concentrate on subjects that have clearly defined contrasts the focus can be really fast. But you have no choice about that usually. So like getter the flash ready, you can also point the lens at the subject and hold the shutter down part way to get the focus right. Then press the shutter when the moment is right.
Ok, all that said, there are cameras that minimize the problems. I have a Canon PowerShot G7 for instance. It's a really sophisticated P&S camera though not as sophisticated as my Nikon SLR. The shutter lag on this camera is rarely more than a second, it operates really fast. Red eye however is the same as with all others so I take remedial action.
One thing that I do like about it however is that it also has a continuous shooting mode. That comes in two flavours. The first is simply continuous shooting, in this case there is a bit of a lag at the start to get the exposure and the focus and after that the camera fires off images at the rate of two or three per second, it's almost as fast as my SLR. However the way it achieves this remarkable feat is to not focus or reset exposure settings after the first shot.
That can be a problem if your subject is moving so there is a second shooting mode called continuous auto-focus. In this case the camera will refocus after each shot. That slows it down a little, I get about one shot per second in that mode but again that's a minimal lag.
That's the best solution I've found to dealing with shutter lag in the P&S cameras. I suppose there are probably a few other models and brands with similar features but I don't know what they are. I'm sorry. Either way I'm really happy with my PowerShot not only because of its responsiveness, but also because it allows me full control of images and it's made of metal instead of a cheap plastic. So it's durable too.
Finally, if you really want to get rid of those problems you have no choice but to go to an SLR. My Nikon SLR rarely ever has any shutter lag. What slows it down briefly is only a rare subject that it can't seem to focus on instantly. It also fires off images at three per second, my other Nikon SLR does that at five per second. And as to red eye, I use an external flash that is mounted high on the camera or held away from the camera. Either way red eye is not an issue in that set up. The only problem with this solution is that it's very expensive. The flash will cost you more than most P&S cameras and of course the camera itself isn't cheap either.
If you do want to go this way, I'd suggest a Nikon D40x as an entry model probably with the Nikon 18mm-200mm lens. That is an ideal combination. If you're a sophisticated photographer, the Nikon D80 is better. Nikon offers three different flases ranging in price from about $250 to about $500.
I hope this helps a little."
Digital Camera with short shutter lag and nice photo (not grainy).? Is there one out there for under $200 maybe even $150?
epic_laydown replied: "canon A570 IS
i bet someone else will recommend it."
psychopiet replied: "no
Get a real camera, something like a Nikon D200 or one from Canon."
Elvis replied: "canon a570"
skizzie72 replied: "Kodak eashyshare V803 isnt a bad camera at all. i've never had a problem with it. its perfect for an everyday camera and it even has video with sound. very short shutter time
at most you'll pay $180"
TheCat replied: "Fujifilm F31fd or F50fd
Half-press Lag (0->S1): 0.3 - 0.6 s
Half to Full-press Lag (S1->S2): 0.02 "Fujifilm quotes a lag of 0.01 seconds - this seems fair (this is one of the fastest responses we've ever seen on a compact zoom camera).""
snowwillow20 replied: "I have the canon A570 IS and it takes great pictures and great mini movies. I don't think there is an inexpensive digital camera with a short shutter lag, but the trick is, when get ready to take the picture, push down halfway and wait. I do this with my gradndaughter and i learned that tip on yahoo answers. I also have the review set to off. Also with out the flash on the lag is shorter. Get a 2G card or better. I like the quality of pics."
Digital cameras and shutter speed lag? I have a 5 MP camera and there is a lag of about 1 second between pressing the button and the shutter operating.
Useless for action shots.
Would a digital SLR solve this problem, or do i need to invest in a higher MP P&S camera?
Thanks
Hitachi HDC-530e
Tall paul
TallPaul replied: "dSLR is instant. But most newer cameras are pretty much instant anyway. What make/model is yours?
Edit:
I can't find any reviews for your camera. If it it the same for every shot then it's the camera and nothing you can do about it.
I suspect that although it has a 5MP sensor it uses electronics from the 2 or 3MP camera era.
If you're serious about your photography the a dSLR is the way to go. Otherwise, any new p&s digital camera will have no perceptible shutter lag."
Bunches replied: "The specs I've been reading (for Canon dslr) is about 0.3 secs shutter lag. Should be ok for most action shots"
Northernscum replied: "DSLR's have no lag whatsoever"
Jake replied: "ok.. this is just a suggestion. I looked at a digital slr and it had live view and there was a huge lag in shutter speed... try turning the display off and look through the viewfinder. Or, just buy a new digital slr. I recommend a Nikon d40. It is good for people stepping up from point and shoot cameras."
Jimmy replied: "What shooting mode are you using? P&S cameras have several shooting modes and some use slower shutter access. Also, with auto focus, there can be a lag if the camera is attempting to focus and not ready when you are.
Investing in a DSLR would eliminate as much lag as possible. A newer P&S could also be the answer.
If you decide to buy a new camera, go to an actual camera store and try some cameras. That's the best way to buy a camera."
VINTAGE MUSIC replied: "Quicker than 1 second and you are talking a digital SLR."

More Websites
Tags
shutter button, lag time, shutter release, digital photography, digital camera shutter lag,
digital camera quick shutter speed,
electric toothbrush best,
corkscrew juncus,
radio flyer wagon decorations,
maglite mini led,
sconce definition,
easel weasel,
digital camera new york,
electric toothbrush stand,
anti aging systems,
information on premarin,
medication norvasc,
camaro z28,
ruggers,
is lithium safe,
rashes from allergic reactions to penicillin,
kodak lithium battery,
dosing of amoxicillin for cats,
adhd strattera
Digital Camera Shutter Lag © 2009
Credit Cards
|
Emo Names
|
Pickup Lines
Report Abuse to: abuse(at)5nxs.com